Free Government
Democracy In Your Hands.

sign up | log in
  • Home
  • Legislation
  • Polls
  • Forums
  • Groups
  • People

FreeGovernment.org is in active development. We consider your feedback critical to our success, so please share your suggestions through this form.

All polls Poll forum Show related bill
Do you support FG Bill #4?
Your vote is set to adviser
Poll Statistics
Today All Users Verified Voters
Yes 40.0% n/a
No 60.0% n/a
All 15 0
Topics Being Discussed
  • Bill Analysis
Description & Updates
H.R.5889 Orphan Works Act of 2008
Statistics in Real-Time
Timeline of Poll Results
Poll Comments
christopherp, Sep 05, 2008 02:37pm

As an artist, I find this bill offensive. It basically has stripped away my rights to my property and hands it off to the first billionaire it sees. If this were made into a law I can see artist across America either constantly fighting for their art or not producing any at all. And a world without art is not one I would like to participate in.

jshumaker, Westborough, MA Jul 11, 2008 02:35pm

I definitely prefer Lawrence Lessig’s suggestion in that article to model it more along the lines of patents with an automatic protection for a certain period, and registration for a longer period. The system described by this bill isn’t good.

peterdarkness, Texas Jul 11, 2008 10:44am

After reading this bill, it does seem like it would make it much more difficult for artists, authors, and etc.

Its much easier just to put your name\company\etc. in the work than to go through the process this bill requires of an artist to get a copyright.

Being protected by copyright without having to sign up for something is the way it should be.

brandonburt, Jul 11, 2008 06:25am

This bill does not solve the problem people think it does. Its name is purposefully misleading.

Yes, there is a serious problem with copyright law—it limits fair use and gives unfair advantage to corporate interests at the expense of artists, software designers, authors and musicians.

However, this bill does not solve that problem. All it does is repeal the 1978 law which made copyright an “opt-out” rather than an “opt-in” system. This will cause problems for artists, software designers, authors and musicians.

Creative people will be required to submit vital stats to the government in order to copyright their material. If copyright is genuinely infringed, a creator’s options for seeking compensation are severely curtailed.

Yes, copyright reform is necessary. But this bill does nothing to relieve the concerns we all have. This particular bill is a corporate trick, and it should be rejected.

See Lawrence Lessig’s Little Orphan Artworks for a good discussion of this issue.

deceitfulsteve, Jul 11, 2008 01:12am

Some people are saying this bill could be bad for open source software. Thoughts? Or know of a good commentary on the bill?

Displaying all 5 entries

Updates

New Users

gwillen
Person
djdesjardins
Person
Republican Party
powellc
Person
Other
ME
jfinkels
Person
zstarmac
Person
Democratic Party
Eugene, OR
bdanaher17
Person
Libertarian Party
Blue Springs, MO

Support FreeGovernment.org

Recent Posts

brokenladder posted on Electoral Reform Party
Here's an idea i have for a "unity" type of party. A "metaparty" essentially. Our goal is to serve as an alternative to the plurality-based two party system, enabling the current alternative parties, as well as new ones, to function as "sub-parties". Our...
nosetu commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Freedom is only an illusion. Unless we get involved in the "core" of our government, our government will only superficially give us the freedoms it feels it needs to keep us docile. Even if the government needed to stage numerous parties in debates to feed our thirst they would still...
bdanaher17 commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Why not! Freedom is Popular.

Recent Polls

"Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?"
4 votes
100.0% Yes 0.0% No
"Should Scientology be disbanded?"
12 votes
41.7% Yes 58.3% No
"Churches should be free to decide, without government interference, which couples they will or will not marry."
15 votes
93.3% Yes 6.7% No
© 2008 FreeGovernment.org
About Us | Contact Us | Blog
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Source Code
Give us feedback!