Free Government
Democracy In Your Hands.

sign up | log in
  • Home
  • Legislation
  • Polls
  • Forums
  • Groups
  • People

FreeGovernment.org is in active development. We consider your feedback critical to our success, so please share your suggestions through this form.

All polls Poll forum
Churches should be free to decide, without government interference, which couples they will or will not marry.
Your vote is set to adviser
Poll Statistics
Today All Users Verified Voters
Yes 93.3% n/a
No 6.7% n/a
All 15 0
Topics Being Discussed

No topics for this poll.

Description & Updates
Some churches sincerely believe that same-sex marriage is contrary to God's will, whereas other churches believe, with equal sincerity, that gay or lesbian marriages are blessed in God's eyes. Most state governments, however, make same-sex marriage illegal, even in churches which would like to solemnize such unions. Obviously, it would be wrong for the government to force a church to perform a same-sex marriage against its will. So isn't it equally wrong for the government to prevent churches that firmly believe in same-sex marriage from performing its ordinances?
Statistics in Real-Time
Timeline of Poll Results
Poll Comments
daltanion, Sep 17, 2008 03:51pm

I don’t support Gay marriage, but it should not be regulated by the central government, that’s not liberty, thats fascism.

furfreiheit, Sep 09, 2008 10:55am

Married couple as a civil body has legal and tax implications that church cannot force the government to comply. Therefore, a church can hold wedding ceremonies, but the marriage status simply has no effect as seen by the government.

symetrist, Aug 31, 2008 12:04am

obviously a church should have that choice. A state, however should not be able to ban any marriage between 2 adult, consenting, humans (had to be specific on that one :).

nosetu, Maine Aug 30, 2008 07:27pm

The subjective nature of the church (any church) should allow it to make its own decision as to whom it marries even if it is not considered a legal union by the state. Religion and/or god are after all a subjective term. The government on the other hand should be a full representation of the whole unit and thus protect “every” individual’s legal right as to their union. To be legally married one needs a marriage license from the state first.

lacerace87, Idaho Aug 30, 2008 06:55pm

Love is love, it can’t have a cap put on it.

Displaying all 5 entries

Updates

New Users

gwillen
Person
djdesjardins
Person
Republican Party
powellc
Person
Other
ME
jfinkels
Person
zstarmac
Person
Democratic Party
Eugene, OR
bdanaher17
Person
Libertarian Party
Blue Springs, MO

Support FreeGovernment.org

Recent Posts

brokenladder posted on Electoral Reform Party
Here's an idea i have for a "unity" type of party. A "metaparty" essentially. Our goal is to serve as an alternative to the plurality-based two party system, enabling the current alternative parties, as well as new ones, to function as "sub-parties". Our...
nosetu commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Freedom is only an illusion. Unless we get involved in the "core" of our government, our government will only superficially give us the freedoms it feels it needs to keep us docile. Even if the government needed to stage numerous parties in debates to feed our thirst they would still...
bdanaher17 commented on Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?
Why not! Freedom is Popular.

Recent Polls

"Do you think that third party candidates should ever, for any reason, be allowed to debate major candidates?"
4 votes
100.0% Yes 0.0% No
"Should Scientology be disbanded?"
12 votes
41.7% Yes 58.3% No
"Churches should be free to decide, without government interference, which couples they will or will not marry."
15 votes
93.3% Yes 6.7% No
© 2008 FreeGovernment.org
About Us | Contact Us | Blog
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Source Code
Give us feedback!